Back to blog
|3 min read

DeFi After Black Thursday: What Broke and What Held

The March crash was DeFi's first real stress test. MakerDAO's liquidation engine failed. Gas prices made the network unusable. But the core protocols survived — and the lessons learned will make the system stronger.

defiriskethereum
DeFi After Black Thursday: What Broke and What Held

DeFi After Black Thursday: What Broke and What Held

Two weeks after Black Thursday, the DeFi ecosystem is still processing what happened. The March 12th crash was not just a price event — it was a systems test. The first time that the composable, interconnected DeFi stack faced genuine market stress. The results were instructive: some things broke badly, some things held remarkably well, and the gap between the two reveals where the work needs to happen.

What Broke

MakerDAO's liquidation engine. When ETH's price collapsed, thousands of MakerDAO vaults fell below their collateralisation ratio and needed to be liquidated. The liquidation mechanism works through auctions — liquidators bid Dai to purchase the discounted collateral. But Ethereum network congestion caused gas prices to spike above 200 gwei, making it uneconomical for most liquidators to submit bids. A small number of liquidators — some say as few as one — were able to win auctions with bids of zero Dai, acquiring millions of dollars of ETH collateral for free. Vault owners lost everything. The system lost approximately $8 million.

The failure was not in the smart contract logic. It was in the assumption that liquidation auctions would always have competitive bidding. That assumption held in normal conditions. It failed catastrophically when network congestion prevented bidders from participating.

Ethereum's throughput. The network processed transactions at capacity throughout the crisis, but the gas price mechanism meant that only users willing to pay extraordinary fees could get transactions confirmed. For users trying to add collateral to prevent liquidation, or trying to participate in liquidation auctions, the network was effectively unusable at the moment it was most needed.

What Held

Compound continued to function. Its liquidation mechanism — which uses a simpler, first-come-first-served model rather than auctions — processed liquidations throughout the crisis without the failures that affected MakerDAO. The design tradeoff — less capital efficiency in exchange for more robust liquidation — proved its value under stress.

Uniswap continued to process trades. Volume spiked as users rushed to sell assets, and the automated market maker handled the load without interruption. Slippage was high — as expected in a crash — but the protocol functioned as designed.

The Dai peg recovered. After briefly trading above $1.10 during the crisis — as demand for Dai to repay loans exceeded supply — the peg gradually returned to $1.00 as the market stabilised. The peg mechanism worked, albeit with more volatility than anyone would like.

The Lessons

The core lesson is that DeFi's composability creates systemic risk that is not visible in normal conditions. When ETH's price drops, MakerDAO vaults need liquidation. Liquidation requires Ethereum transactions. Ethereum transactions require gas. Gas prices spike during high demand. High gas prices prevent liquidators from bidding. Failed liquidations create bad debt. Bad debt threatens the Dai peg. A threatened Dai peg affects every protocol that uses Dai as collateral.

This cascade — from price decline to network congestion to liquidation failure to systemic risk — was not modelled by any of the individual protocols because it spans the boundaries between them. Each protocol optimised for its own risk parameters. Nobody optimised for the system.

My View

Black Thursday was the best thing that could have happened to DeFi — short of an actual catastrophic failure. It revealed systemic risks while the total value at stake was still small enough to absorb the losses. MakerDAO has already begun implementing fixes: increasing the auction duration, adding circuit breakers, and diversifying collateral types. The broader DeFi ecosystem is rethinking assumptions about network availability, gas costs, and liquidation mechanics.

The system will be stronger for having been tested. But the test was a reminder that DeFi is still experimental infrastructure — and that the gap between "works in normal conditions" and "works in all conditions" is where the real engineering challenge lies.


Stress tests are gifts. They reveal the failures that normal operation conceals. Black Thursday was DeFi's stress test — and the failures it revealed are now being fixed. The system that emerges will be more resilient than the one that entered.

Georgi Shulev

Georgi Shulev

Entrepreneur and fintech innovator at the intersection of agentic commerce, blockchain, and AI. Co-founder of Yugo.

Back to all posts